Posts Tagged ‘Using social media’

Your Gatherers: Giving ‘Em What They Want

25
January
2010

It’s time to stop thinking of social media peeps as fans and followers. They’re gatherers and you may not be giving them enough to come back.

Blake Bowyer
Media Program Analyst

I’ve never really liked the terms “fans” or “followers” for Facebook and Twitter users, respectively. It’s the kind of marketing vocabulary that seems presumptuous. As a verb, someone may have fan-ed your brand or followed your company, but that doesn’t mean they’re a fan of your online presence and you don’t have anything to prove. As much as it pains me to throw another term in the mix, “gatherer” is more appropriate and meaningful. For some reason, this mob has approached your brand after an encounter in another medium or possibly through a tangible interaction. They could have read about you, they may have purchased your products, but now they’ve found you online.

What do you do next?

Act. Give them what they want. New fans and followers expect something, but not the same old something. They could get that from where they’ve been before, but they approached you online for something else. What can you give them? How do you keep the gatherers from dispersing? Know what they want and what they expect from you.

eMarketer gathered some recent information from a small MarketingSherpa study on Reasons for Friending or Following Companies Through Social Media and this table shows the results:

110430 Your Gatherers: Giving Em What They Want

Additionally, a Razorfish study exploring the Primary Reason US Internet Users Follow a Brand on Twitter isn’t identical, but in the same vein:

1085511 Your Gatherers: Giving Em What They Want

While these responses seem intuitive (coupons provide instant, tangible benefits through savings), they’re important nonetheless. Your brand has gatherers because – surprise, surprise – they’re looking for an added benefit; they want value. Being a fan or follower is akin to being a member of an exclusive club or a loyalty program. Your gatherers are wondering, “I’ve found your brand and have chosen to show my support. What will you give me in return?” They’ve done something through social media that other media would never facilitate – they’ve reached out their hands and want to make a deal. Those are the three defining attributes of effective social media marketing: efforts are reciprocal, two-way, and both parties benefit to make it work.

They’ve gathered, now bring them back. You might be counting fans and followers, but seeing those terms as literal is old media thinking with new media execution. They’ll butt heads eventually and your gatherers are more likely to lynch your brand than advocate it.

Week 4: Utilizing Social Media and the Word-of-Mouth Fallacy – Part 1

9
July
2009

Why marketers can’t “use” word-of-mouth and why they shouldn’t want to.

Blake Bowyer
Media Program Analyst

Every so often you’ll come across a Web site or textbook that lists “word-of-mouth” as a tactic in the marketer’s arsenal. At first thought, it doesn’t seem crazy; word-of-mouth marketing is often an important consideration in spreading a company’s message, gaining customer referrals, and building goodwill. 

Word-of-mouth is at the essence of social media. Twitter, Facebook, and the blogosphere are basically hyper-efficient platforms for making word-of-mouth happen. Social media are the striking surface for the match and you’re more likely to start a fire by using them in concert (unless you’re able to get a spark from the sole of a shoe – but I wouldn’t count on that on a desert island). In short, social media have bestowed upon marketers a way to potentially facilitate buzz with the click of a mouse.

But …

Here’s the thing: word-of-mouth marketing is still the “effect” in this casual relationship. All word-of-mouth starts with a noteworthy product/service experience or a piece of wise or salacious information. Now, since it’s unlikely you’re working with the very latter, think about what makes your company, what it provides, or what it says worth telling others about. 

And that’s where the crux exists and we must make a crucial distinction. This means the value your company provides must extend past the person it serves directly. The value must be worth spreading. After all, the spreaders – or as Seth Godin calls them, “sneezers” – are putting their reputations as sages on the line to vouch for you or your company. Ask this: What companies do you trust enough to do that?

That being said, social media have made it both easier and harder for you to give the spreaders a message in the right format and clarity to share it with social networks. For example, a positive experience at Great Clips might not be so easy (or remotely interesting) to express on Facebook. However, if Great Clips set up a Twitter account for the freshly shorn to anonymously tweet about their experiences or take an in-salon satisfaction survey that publishes results in real-time, it would be more compelling. Now, to use that to the company’s advantage, Great Clips must satisfy its customers. Though, isn’t that the idea anyway?

Come back tomorrow for Part 2 to learn more about word-of-mouth and its love/hate relationship with social media. In the meantime, click HERE to see a success story with social media coming from an unexpected source: Priceline. One highlight – after customers secure a hotel, flight, or rental car via the "Name Your Own Price" option, they can brag about their bidding prowess on an automatically-generated deal tweet. Check it out:

TwitterBlakeJBowyerIjustgota25st 3 Week 4: Utilizing Social Media and the Word of Mouth Fallacy   Part 1