Archive for July, 2009

10 Pithy Social Media Tips in 140 Characters or Less

31
July
2009

High wisdom density. True micro-blogging for Friday’s short attention spans.

Blake Bowyer
Media Program Analyst
  1. As always, start with a purpose and set objectives. Build systems around social media as you would other marketing initiatives.
  2. Implement and measure against yourself. Fewer benchmarks exist in social media, so you might have to create your own.
  3. Get buy-in. Make sure others take social media efforts as seriously as you do or long-term outlooks won’t hold up. They’ll fail.
  4. Observe best practices but don’t mimic. Social media levels the playing field and its agility gives even the little guys room to innovate.
  5. Using social media means writing in headlines and for eternity.  Be cautious, but more importantly make sure you can stand by what you say.
  6. Give stuff away, worthwhile and upfront. Make sure the value you offer is clear and understandable, no matter how great it is.
  7. Type from an office, but loosen your tie. Social media is serious, but best used with a colloquial voice. Stuffy travels nowhere.
  8. If you make mistakes, correct them. A social media apology goes a long way toward rectifying what you’ll have to anyway.
  9. Keep up. Don’t get stuck on the next Friendster while your audience retreats. It’s environmental scanning on a global, real-time scale.
  10. Be social. It sounds obvious, but organizations and employees often forget to connect. Reach out, listen, and toss your ideas into the mix.

- BONUS -

Be succinct. When everyone has a voice, you can’t afford to waste people’s time and pixels.

Now it’s your turn. Fit these 140-character tips into your social media strategy and create some of your own.

Certainly No Mention of Social Networks in the Constitution

29
July
2009

Stiff consequences result from social network users exercising their freedom of speech.

Christine Pepin
Media Coordinator

So, we all keep talking about the social networks and their evolution.  We’ve run the gamut from discussions on Twitter’s lack of a viable revenue model to its value as a marketing tool.  We’ve weeded through social network supporters, haters and skeptics.  It seems to me, though, that the majority of those knowledgeable in our space recognize more valuable marketing potential in the fastest growing networks, such as Twitter and Facebook, than not.

But, in my cloud of optimism and excitement about what these networks can promote from a marketer’s standpoint, I tend to forget about the consequences of free speech spreading as fast as it does in these mediums.  On top of the fact that with written word, there’s no debate on who said what; the proof is in the pudding.  “Delete” becomes trivial, as technology allows us a back button, or a web history or an automatic save function.  Then, they’ll be someone, somewhere having recorded and saved an offense before we even realize our mistake. 

I found myself with wide-eyes this morning reading an ABC news article, as I was reminded of the consequences of social network users freely voicing their opinions.  From an apartment renter to a Congressman to Al Roker, I quickly learned that our uncensored expressions can lead to fines, unemployment or a bruised reputation.  Being mindful of the repercussions of what we post online is very important.  I’ll recap a few from the article that were interesting; maybe we can learn from their mistakes:

-  A Chicago tenant faces a $50,000 lawsuit by the Horizons Group Management where she used to reside by posting the following on Twitter: “Who said sleeping in a moldy apartment was bad for you? Horizon really thinks it’s okay." 

-  A New York City official resigns over controversial comments posted on Facebook in reference to President Obama’s opinions on the arrest of Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates Jr.

-  Arizona man tweets about leaving for vacation and returns to find his house was robbed a few thousands of dollars in video equipment stolen.

-  Al Roker snaps pictures of potential yury members from jury duty and posts them to Twitter; a violation of court rules.

-  Top House Republican discloses details about travels to Iraq and Afganistan on Twitter; leaving the Pentagon to question its policy on classified information and security implications on social networks.

Perhaps these cases will spark us to think about the implications of what we post, both professionally and personally.

Social Media Growing Pains: Facebook Goes Grey, Twitter Ages with Grace

29
July
2009

Twitter’s new homepage is the latest sign that micro-blogging has grown up and may be surging ahead with newfound power.

Blake Bowyer
Media Program Analyst

In this era, it’s not unusual for social media to change and grow, thrive and perish. What isn’t common is organic social media maturation. MySpace underwent an overhaul and a reduction in force when it saw its revenues slipping and membership receding. Facebook tweaked and over-tweaked when it sensed competitors encroaching on its ground. Twitter – and for the sake of this topic, let’s ignore that the service has plenty of its own bugs and no discernible revenue model – however, is embracing the unique role it has discovered, or perhaps, stumbled upon.

Most tellingly, we’ve witnessed a change in Twitter’s own self-image. No longer is it about sharing what people are doing as individuals, but what’s happening in a global community. Conversations have formed around causes, coups, deaths, births, and everything in-between. Many times in the past year, Twitter users have been the first – and sometimes the only – to know. We’ve caught wind of breaking news, had front-row seats to marketing misfires, and engaged in some of the most pointless discussions on-record. However, in the end, Twitter has evolved into a platform on which anyone can, as Twitter now puts it, “discover what’s happening right now, anywhere in the world.”

Even those outside of Twitter have been affected. News outlets of all sizes have been outpaced by tweeting on-lookers and have chosen to embrace the service after seeing value in the conversation. As a skeptic at one point, even I thought the hype surrounding Twitter was just that: hype. However, while Twitter might not do everything it promises in its grand ambition of share and discover, over the past six months, it awoke to find itself with a greater purpose.

Somehow I doubt Mr. Jack Dorsey knew his micro-blogging service would be a crux in the June 2009 Iranian election protests, but it was thrust into the melee. Twitter responded admirably by facilitating information exchange, real-time updates, and on-the-ground communication. The U.S. State Department reached out to Twitter and asked its executives to delay a maintenance period so Iranians could use the service to communicate.

Whether or not Iran was the reason or just the tipping point, Twitter grew up.

Facebook may have grown, but Twitter is evolving. A recent statistic being thrown around the World Wide Web says that 69% of adults “didn’t know enough about Twitter to comment on the service.” That’s being translated as: More than two-thirds of adults don’t know what Twitter is. And while that deduction may be a bit of a stretch, the fact is that Twitter still has a lot of room to grow. 

As Facebook experiences a siege of college students’ adult parents, aunts, and professors, Twitter remains a bastion in social media for the users that saved it from anonymity and continue to make it tick. Twitter may be one of the best examples of crowdsourcing, because each tweet has decided what to make of it.

So, while Twitter might have to accept Ashton and Britney as unofficial spokespeople, it has other notches in its belt to be proud of. And a slick new homepage to highlight how far it has come. It’s a lot to ask, but sign out for a moment and give it a glance.

Grooveshark is the New Napster

28
July
2009

Free Online Music Version 2.0

Stefanie Berliant
Media Coordinator

Since the good ol’days of illegally downloading music from sites like Kazaa and LimeWire, are essentially over, free internet radio stations have become more popular than ever.  Grooveshark, Pandora, Jango, and imeem are just a few examples of free online music sites that have evolved from the crackdown of not just downloading music, but sharing it. While music sharing 1.0 sites like BearShare and Napster have tried to reinvent themselves, they have fallen out of grace due to the negative press of huge legal battles and distribution of malware.  This next generation of free internet music sites is celebrating the ability to customize and share music. 

The best parts about these free streaming music online stations are that they’re FREE (duh) with limited commercial interruptions (even better!), social networking functionalities, and features that suggest other songs/artists you may like based off of the song you are listening to.  Most of these sites have been widgetized and made more accessible with the ability to ‘tune in’ on smartphones, allowing you the pleasure of rocking out to your personalized “Journey Station” in gridlock. Whether or not you are using these sites to promote your band or simply help get you through your daily 9 to 5, one thing among all of these Version 2.0 online music sites remains constant: free music rocks!

The More Things Change … 5 Lessons That Aren’t Unique to “New” Media

28
July
2009

Media might feel different, but the fundamentals of marketing are steadfast.

Blake Bowyer
Media Program Analyst

“New” and “old" media are misnomers. There aren’t any new media, just stages of media that developed from what always existed. By definition, media (in the marketing milieu) are simply platforms for information exchange; ways to communicate. “Old” media can best be characterized as one-way and “new” media involve dialogs, but we never experienced a media revolution, only an evolution. More than that, “old” media, while flagging, haven’t expired or seen their 15 minutes run out. Media themselves have undergone a facelift, but still has many of the same principles at their core.

As I discussed in the last blog post, new media still require proper strategic planning and the development of objectives to achieve long-term effectiveness. Our impressions of marketing vehicles may have changed and our mindset is more customer-centric (as it should have been all along), but the most noble of marketing rules still hold true. The media metamorphosis is not only changing the platforms marketing professionals use, but bringing them back to their roots.

Did you know the American Marketing Association (AMA) has a policy in its bylaws that requires a review of the definition of “marketing” because it “makes sense to reconsider and update the Association’s view of its field?” The definition was most recently updated in 2007. Its current iteration saw marketing change from a “function” to an “activity” and mince some more words to broaden the meaning. However, the four most important parts that overlap between the past and current definitions are:

  • Creating
  • Communicating
  • Delivering
  • Value

So, while many argue that “new” media have given the landscape such a facelift that marketers from 2004 would be hard-pressed to recognize it, the four words above say its essence got nothing more than a minor touch-up. That being said, here are five more things they can engrave on the walls of the marketing Hall of Fame:

  1. Marketing is about relationships and always has been. ADVERTISING may not have always been about relationships, but marketing – from the top-down messaging to the ground-level sales force – has been a practice focused on relationships with customers. Not all are good or effective, but they exist and they didn’t sprout up with new media. Long-term success has been built on one of two things: relationship or necessity. The latter isn’t as common anymore and that’s why the former is highlighted as one of the cornerstones of contemporary marking.
  2. Marketing is about providing value. In a past blog post, I wrote that people and organizations might need to give a little value away for free to generate clients. And, it’s true. More competition demands more from each competitor, so enhancing customer value is essential.
  3. Originality and creativity stand out. Consistent and satisfying customer engagement will benefit your customers, but it won’t always delight them. Something extraordinary will catch people’s attention – and steal their money if it delivers after the dog-and-pony show.
  4. Segmenting, targeting, and positioning. The Elizabethan blacksmith knew it, Henry Ford knew it, and Steve Jobs knows it.
  5. Branding. Though controversial, one cannot argue the gut reaction of organizations like Microsoft, Firestone, BMW, Enron, Starbucks, and the oft-mentioned Harley Davidson. Brands matter and, like the branding performed on products like cows, sidewalks, and furniture, demonstrate quality and a certain level of accountability. Brands are literally stamps of approval and stamping a product can build a name or make it crumble.

While in no way exhaustive, this short list of examples shows that modern marketing concepts aren’t new, but evolved (maybe rebranded?). Don’t purge your “old” media mindset yet – you might excavate some pearls of wisdom.

Watching Audiences That Watch Display Ads

27
July
2009

Researchers at the Walt Disney Company utilize biometric data from test subjects to monitor eye movement and reactions towards display ads.

George Assimakopoulos
Principal Manager

The New York Times reported today that Disney executives have established a measurement process to scrutinize online advertising display data to determine how, when and why web surfers see and click banner ads.  As most online advertisers will agree, it is fairly easy to determine how website visitors react to an ad campaign once they click on an ad.  But what about the millions of eyeballs that never click on the banners.  Disney believes that not nearly enough is understood about this non-clicking audience and should be researched further to maximize ad revenue opportunities.

To read the entire New York Times article on how Disney Labs is planning and executing this research – CLICK HERE.

Webinar Follow-Up: An Addendum on Measuring Social Media Effectively

24
July
2009

After co-hosting WOMMA’s second highest-attended webinar (ever!), we want to explain a fundemental insight.

Blake Bowyer
Media Program Analyst

How do you measure marketing success? There’s one way: eyeballs. Then there’s another way: response. In an era of constant media – social and otherwise – immersion, it’s hard enough to get the first and nearly impossible to gauge the second. But, that’s the business we’re in at EyeTraffic Media and something we think all marketers should provide to their clients. The era of unaccountability has been put out to pasture as clients have begun to demand what they rightfully deserve: ROI.

Thankfully social media bestowed upon marketers throngs of new numbers and mountains of data that enabled them to measure just about anything. Or so it seemed. Social media brought as many challenges as it did boons as far as developing useful metrics. We now have the three F’s of Social Media – Friends, Fans, and Followers – clickthrough, bounce, and conversion rates, and more ratios than we can hardly handle.

The numbers behind social media have spawned jobs, departments, and entire organizations. For true marketers, it’s both beautiful and demanding. The trick is figuring out what metrics are meaningful and which aren’t. Just like every marketing era before the present, the tools of the discipline have been twisted and turned into a sophisticated smoke-and-mirrors show. Some promise to multiply your followers, jumpstart your blog views, and improve an obscure little term called “engagement”. Measuring social media marketing campaigns can get downright silly, even with numbers behind them.

However, with social media, we can monitor consumer activity closer than ever before with click paths, destination, time on site, and ad tolerance; user behavior tracking that was rarely achieved – if ever – with traditional media. With all of this fantastic information, it’s easy to get caught up in just having the data and making hasty adjustments. But we must always remember, no matter how shiny, new, and sophisticated the information we possess gets, a simple piece of Marketing 101: start with objectives.

Not only does each organization have unique objectives, but campaigns may also have varying goals. The problem is, social media came to most of us with such speed and potential that many organizations failed to develop a new strategy. We don’t treat them like traditional media, so why should we use the same strategy? If most organizations stepped back and thought about their original reason for getting on Facebook, MySpace, Twitter, and the like, my estimation is it would boil down to this:

  • Use social media for marketing.

Really? Would you say that with other mediums like broadcast or print? I hope not.

The point is, more sophisticated media demand more sophisticated analysis. When marketers didn’t possess as much information, they had an excuse not to dig through it. But now, they must use it for the sake of their clients, because they’ll demand it at some point.

Now, how do you measure social media? Whoa. You’re skipping a step. First decide what you want to do with social media, then decide how to measure it.

To help get the hang of it, below are some resources for social media monitoring – not measuring – that will give you data to help gauge your social media presence:

Viralheat

Social Mention

Techrigy

So, get an assessment and see how you stack-up. If your organization is completely off the grid, this is a good starting point: objectives. Then you can pick from the litany of metrics to decide how to measure your success on reaching those objectives.

Yahoo’s Definition of Innovation: Redesign

21
July
2009

Yahoo to launch a new hompage format today.

Stefanie Berliant
Media Coordinator

With the launch of Microsoft’s search engine, Bing, Google continuing to dominate the world along with Facebook and Twitter, Yahoo has decided in order to keep up with the Joneses, they should give their homepage a makeover.

This redesign has been in the works for a while and was scheduled to be released in the fall of 2009.  But as luck (aka overtime) would have it, the new look will be revealed today.  Forgive me for my lack of excitement; I feel that redesigning a website is about the least innovative thing a company as powerful as Yahoo could do.

But maybe I am speaking too soon.  What Yahoo has in store with this redesign is to make it an "internet gateway," retooling the left hand navigation bar to allow for widgets and apps like Facebook.  The user can mouse over these plug-ins and access these apps without leaving Yahoo.com.  And of course, the new look would not be complete without a contextual ad unit within the expandable window.  This feature can also be synched with mobile devices.

Yes, Yahoo’s current homepage is not the prettiest to look at; I would agree that a makeover is much needed.  But will it give Yahoo the boost they are looking for?  Doubt it.

You Don’t Have to Give Up the Farm, but Social Media Marketing Demands a Peek Inside the Chicken Coop – Part 2

17
July
2009

Engaging in the conversation is at the heart of social media marketing, but why would anyone want to talk with you?

Blake Bowyer
Media Program Analyst

| Read Part 1 |

Previously, I talked about getting comfortable with the concept of FREE (giving away ideas, products, and experiences) if you or your organization wants to fully embrace social media marketing. Coincidentally, Stan Schroeder at Mashable (a news and opinion hub that is becoming the social media standard) wrote the article “You Think ‘Free’ is Only About the Price? It’s Not.” The piece has a great explanation of costs to the customer that aren’t measured in dollars and suggests these new models might be part of a cycle and that ‘free’ will force players in the marketplace to get creative. So, check that out if you want a bit more exploration of the costs at the other end of the conversation.

But back to where you come in and how social media demand you to be a bit more generous.

The power of social media comes down to one obvious attribute: they’re social. They’re social in that groups of users can share information they think will be valuable (interesting, entertaining, or enlightening) to their networks. As an individual user of a social network, I’m not looking to bore the people with whom I’m connected. 

That’s where many organizations lose sight of the purpose of social media. On Facebook, you’re not the world’s biggest multi-national or the nation’s most profitable company; you’re friend #432 or fan page #17. You might have twenty times the friends or fans of Joe College Student, but are people gathering to listen or just hanging out? While your brand or logo might have a lot of clout offline, the Internet is used for finding information and solutions, so your social media marketing strategy must come down to providing one or the other.

That said, your organization must be aware of two more obstacles when choosing to spread its message via social media:

  • The audience you want isn’t captive.
  • The audience you want can manipulate its social media experience.

If changing the channel during a commercial was easy, surfing to another of the millions of Web sites is a cinch. Not to mention, even if a message does happen to be at the right place at the right time, it can be the victim of blocking, skipping, pausing, or even the dreaded de-friending. 

Given those two social media realities, it seems a bit trickier than buying ad space and blasting out your message, right? It is, but if used properly, social media is your vehicle for developing relationships when providing value. Offer incentives, ask for/reward suggestions, entertain, inform, and enlighten. Don’t advertise.

In social media, you speak with people, not talk at them. Get used to that.

So, you’re existing in social media, you feel confident about the value you’re offering, you’re engaging in quality conversations, and you’re making good traction with Twitter, Facebook, and the like. But, how do you know? That’s where metrics come in. Join Principle George Assimakopoulos and Media Coordinator Ryan Moss as they practice what we preach and learn how to Effectively Measure Social Media at our complimentary webinar next Wednesday (7/22) @ 11 a.m. with the Word of Mouth Marketing Association (WOMMA).

Click the image below to register. See you there!

ETMWOMMALOGO 1 You Dont Have to Give Up the Farm, but Social Media Marketing Demands a Peek Inside the Chicken Coop   Part 2

You Don’t Have to Give Up the Farm, but Social Media Demand a Peek Inside the Chicken Coop – Part 1

15
July
2009

Trade secrets are safe, but effectively using blogs, Facebook, and Twitter for marketing requires that you give away a little more than you’d like.

Blake Bowyer
Media Program Analyst


Before wide adoption of the Internet (circa the mid-90s), the majority of technical information existed in silos and on microfiche. People had their professions and areas of expertise to which they generally stuck and dabbled in others called “hobbies”; you could fix a watch, your neighbor could build a deck, and the family down the street could film and edit home videos. Those who could do all of the above were polymaths or Renaissance men (and women).

Then the Internet began maturing and suddenly do-it-yourself (DIY) applied to basically everyone with access to a connection. Personally, among other things, I’ve learned how to tie a tie, play a guitar (poorly), and take better pictures. Not only has this stopped me from bugging my dad every time I had an interview, but also from hiring a guitar instructor and buying a photography book. In other words, I’ve developed all of these talents – at varying levels of proficiency – at a fraction of the cost of what I would have paid before the Internet.

Sorry guitar teachers and photography authors (and you’re welcome dad), the World Wide Web stole my business.

You might be thinking this doesn’t apply to you; your disicipline is so specialized and technical that no one could ever substitute your services with gumption and a data connection. Of course, you’d likely be wrong. Aside from sensitive trades like open heart surgery and high-level construction, somewhere on the Internet is a Web site giving away part – if not all – of the information you rely on for revenue. Even worse, it might be that of a competitor who is subsequently stealing business away from you through transparency and providing value.

That’s the key: value. In marketing, one simple equation for value is benefits / price. I.e., the benefits received as a ratio of the price paid (costs of pocket, opportunity, etc.). Knowing that, something might strike you: when the denominator is zero or close to it, you don’t have to give away much to provide value. Now, I’m not saying you should give away the bare minimum. Chances are, someone’s already doing that and you’ll be back at square one touting your generosity when it can be matched elsewhere.

Admittedly, the strategy of giving away value isn’t a new concept (check out Chris Anderson’s related work in the lengthy article Free! Why $0.00 Is the Future of Business from Wired and his new book Free: The Future of a Radical Price), but it’s still a scary one. However, the organizations that become more comfortable with the tactic put themselves in better positions to compete and build on their offerings through trust and transparency. Those that don’t adjust will eventually be outpaced by competitors, user communities, or info-sharing good Samaritans (see: encyclopedias, classified ads, Internet browsers, email clients, etc.).

How well does this marry with social media marketing? Perfectly. To learn how, come back for Part 2 on Friday or scroll to the top and subscribe.